Be careful with political titles!: 4 examples

To many, it seems that we are witnessing a period where Americans seem unwilling to consider what others feel and believe, and this partisan atmosphere seems to be greater than at any time in recent memory. Instead of proceeding with an open mind, many seem to take the easy way out and resort to a form of name calling, using simplistic labels, rather than seek any meeting of – the – minds, for the greater good! Furthermore, not only is it trying little hole, and, over-simplifying, ineffective, but often inaccurate. also. With that in mind, this article will briefly attempt to consider, examine, and review 4 of these titles/tags, and how they rarely help.

1. Conservative: Many times we hear individuals proclaim that they are conservative, and this is what is best for this nation. However, they seem to apply this concept, irregularly/inconsistently, using convenient aspects, when it is beneficial. For example, by political definition, a conservative emphasizes, responsibly, managing economic and budget issues/issues. Doesn’t that seem, at odds, with a lot of these people, who seem to be unaware of this, when their party’s candidate is president, but surprisingly budget-conscious, when the so-called opposition party becomes, in – energy? We, too, witness that many of these individuals claim to be strict observers of the Constitution, but, again, seem to be selective when using an expanded (convenient) interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, but their often – personally – biased, selective interpretation and application of the First!

two. Liberal/ Progressive: Liberals and/or progressives often emphasize human rights, including civil rights, women’s rights, etc.! They believe that quality health care should be a guaranteed right and not simply available and/or a privilege! Traditionally, this approach emphasizes spending on things related to human beings, rather than appearing to favor the wealthiest! Tax reform is seen as needing, prioritizing, the middle and working class, and the poorest, rather than the richest of us!

3. Moderate: Traditionally, we elected Presidents, whose, personal – political, was, between 5% to the call, left, or the same amount, to the right! They generally seek and emphasize a meeting of minds and finding common ground, for the greater good! Unfortunately, in the current political environment, there are fewer and fewer of these individuals!

Four. Socialist: How is it that some refer to anything that emphasizes government or assisted programs (or those they perceive as not benefiting them) as socialist? The hypocrisy of referring to a necessary financial stimulus, to individuals, as socialism, but, transforming the tax system, and/or providing government funds, to the wealthiest corporations, as acceptable!

Instead of using labels, something meaningless, often for political purposes, wouldn’t it make sense to look for the best way forward? Wake up, America, and demand better!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *